Most liked commenter

Look at who is the “most liked user (commenter)” on the site! гравитации мальчик!  Or Gravity Boy or  Gootar, for those of you who have difficulty pronouncing the other name!  Actually, the chart above simply tabulates the amount of likes his comments have gotten since I put in the new commenting system.

He actually has nowhere near as many comments as Leonard with almost 11,000 comments and posts or Capman911 with 7600+ comments GreatestPotential with 9000+ or Me Lika Do The Cha Cha with 4000+ or the late PedanticKarl with 5000 comments.  So Gootar has some catching up to do!

But, he has been helping me out with some cool stuff for the site and helping a bunch of you with the new commenting system.

So I wanted to give a shout-out to гравитации мальчик for helping everyone out, and I wanted to thank you all for being patient while I work out the technical kinks with the new system!

Now, how do we turn all the comments into huge novel 31 times larger than Moby Dick?

Comments/DISQUS help? Click here.

Allowed HTMLDISQUS Status

Leave a Reply

209 Responses to Most liked commenter

  1. James Sharp says:

    Today, March 14th is Albert Einsteins birthday.
    It is also pi day…
    3.14159265358979323846264338327950288…

  2. Watching James Blunt on Today’s show! He is so naughty! Lol

    February 22nd (222) is James Blunt’s birthday

    p.s. Maybe you like “not the sharpest tool in the shed!” … then of course… James Blunt   :-)

  3. Watching James Blunt on Today’s show! He is so naughty! Lol

    February 22nd (222) is James Blunt’s birthday

    p.s. Maybe you like “not the sharpest tool in the shed!” … then of course… James Blunt   :-)

    • leoNard says:

      {blunt}…that picture sure looks trusty and looks like…

      …………i’m using this to test………………the wordshipping/worship and honor my time :-(

      I have not learn from this… http://www.w3.org/

      How James Blunt saved us from World War 3 (disobeyed Wesley Clark)
      …Blunt was then 25, a captain in the Life Guards and the lead officer at the front of the Nato column. He risked a court martial by refusing to obey those orders from General Wesley Clark to attack the Russian forces.

      In a BBC radio interview last night, Blunt said: “I was given the direct command to overpower the 200 or so Russians who were there. I was the lead officer, with my troop of men behind us… The soldiers directly behind me were from the Parachute Regiment, so they’re obviously game for the fight.

      “The direct command [that] came in from General Wesley Clark was to overpower them,” he said. “Various words were used that seemed unusual to us. Words such as ‘destroy’ came down the radio. We had 200 Russians lined up pointing their weapons at us aggressively … and we’d been told to reach the airfield and take a hold of it. That’s why we were querying our instruction.” The end result was a victory for British common sense. “Fortunately,” Blunt recalled, “up on the radio came General Sir Mike Jackson [commander of the British forces], whose words were, ‘I’m not going to have my soldiers start World War Three.’ He told us, ‘Why don’t we encircle the airfield instead?’ And after a couple of days the Russians there said, ‘Hang on, we have no food and no water. Can we share the airfield with you?’”

      http://www.hotforwords.com/wp-content/uploads/Outtakes-0507.jpg

  4. Wow… Trusty has 398,655,222 (million) views.
    http://www.hotforwords.com/
    She gets about 4 per second

    She is only about one million away from 400 million…
    400,000,000 minus 398,655,222 equals 1,344,778

    That’s about 93 hours (close to 4 days) from now?
    Should be early Friday morning?

  5. hmmm… I found the small picture of Trusty holding the guitar that fglrx and I were talking about. That one actually looks real.

    The same picture used in the calender looks like the bikini top is photo-shopped in. guitar pic.

    So, I guess if the small picture is the real one… Trusty is trusty?
    Can’t be sure of anything.

  6. Why is it that no matter what color bubble bath you use the bubbles are always white?

    We are going to need explicit pictures of this one :-)

  7. After that heavy rain storm the roads are ruined in LA! Feels like I’m back in Russia! I need to get a Russian car now.

    Get a Trabant like this and put “Hot For Words” in the lettering…
    you will stop the show wherever you go   :-)

  8. The Big Bang itself expanded much faster than the speed of light?

    Here is a wild one…
    We all know the universe is created-with / made-from strings.
    The only way for vibrations to travel along the strings would be if there is tension on the strings.
    Light is actually a vibration traveling along the strings.

    TL = mc^2

    Tension * Length = mass * speed of light squared

    Mechanical reason for c in E=mc^2

    So, if we could theoretically reduce the universe to only one string.
    The speed of light is the speed the vibrations travels along the string. The frequency is something different… that would be the note or the color perceived.

    If there was a Big-Bang (which I don’t believe) the singularity would be like the (let’s say) guitar string still coiled up. As you uncoil the guitar string and expand it to its fullest length… that would be the rate of expansion of the universe.

    If you think about this scenario for a minute you will realize… the rate you uncoil the string (for instance… coiled to stretched in 1 second) has nothing whatsoever to do with the speed the string will vibrate.

    If there was a universal expansion… it might have happened incredibly fast or slow… there is no way to know. Completely irrelevant to the speed of light or anything else.
    From zero (singularity) to what we know / perceive as 15 billion light years in what we perceive as one second… why not?
    Then when it has expanded enough to create tension on the field… it starts to vibrate.

    If anything broke free from the field as it was expanding… it might have unimaginable speed.

    p.s. It’s like being a character in a movie… not only do they not know how fast the movie projector is running… they also do not know how long it took to assemble the projector.

  9. Electric and Magnetic field

    Both of those fields are only an effect that originates from the same thing… the actual field the encompasses space made of strings.
    The electric and magnetic are just vibrations or a shape change in the real (flux) particle field.
    An easy 2-D example is the highly stretched tennis net made of the finest spiders web.
    If you were on one side of the net and plucked a string, the vibration would travel along string to the other side of the net. That vibration would set off perpendicular vibrations (and in the real field a shape change if strong enough) up and down in it’s travels.
    If you ask… “wouldn’t the whole net just vibrate?”
    Yes, of course it would but using another example of an actual spiders web…
    If the spider is sitting directly in the middle of his web and something (a bug) lands in his web… he knows the exact direction and placement of the bug.
    This is because the spider and the bug have now actually set up endpoints for a more powerful string vibration… there is a mass on both ends of the web string. And of course whatever string had the initial pluck would have the most powerful vibration.
    Remember this is a linear one string example in a real field the vibration would expand away spherically. But there is of course alway endpoints, every atom with protons is an endpoint.

    “Spooky action at a distance…?” that’s when two endpoints set up their own string connection.

  10. So Snooki has a book coming out…Huh? Any ideas whats the book about?

    I don’t know who that is?

  11. Alternate Red Shift (No Bang):

    Everything is connected by strings.
    The field in space has basically the same tension everywhere.
    The distances to some stars is of course further than others.
    This would have the same effect as playing a longer violin string and getting a lower note.
    Light would still transfer at the same speed but an increased string length (of course) lowers the frequency.

  12. Alternate Red Shift (No Bang):

    Everything is connected by strings.
    The field in space has basically the same tension everywhere.
    The distances to some stars is of course further than others.
    This would have the same effect as playing a longer violin string and getting a lower note.
    Light would still transfer at the same speed but an increased string length (of course) lowers the frequency.

  13. I was just watching this old movie on tv…
    Operation Bikini (1963)
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057387/
    About military guys on a sub going to the isolated Bikini island.
    One guy has a picture of his girl friend glued to the torpedo right above where he sleeps.
    He always says he is “dreaming about her in the bikini.”

    That’s all fine but the end of the movie show girls in bikinis on a deserted island and they play a song that sounds just like “I dream of Jeannie.”

    So I guess Sidney Sheldon…
    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0791084/
    …saw that movie? “I Dream of Jeannie” was 2 years after it.

    Here’s the whole thought process…
    Think of a girls name that rhymes with bikini (for subliminal action)… Jeannie.
    Hey… she can also be a real genie. I’ll even use the deserted island, guys in the military, and the song.

    So, if you are going to rip off something… might as well rip-it-off it completely   :-)

  14. I was just watching this old movie on tv…
    Operation Bikini (1963)
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057387/
    About military guys on a sub going to the isolated Bikini island.
    One guy has a picture of his girl friend glued to the torpedo right above where he sleeps.
    He always says he is “dreaming about her in the bikini.”

    That’s all fine but the end of the movie show girls in bikinis on a deserted island and they play a song that sounds just like “I dream of Jeannie.”

    So I guess Sidney Sheldon…
    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0791084/
    …saw that movie? “I Dream of Jeannie” was 2 years after it.

    Here’s the whole thought process…
    Think of a girls name that rhymes with bikini (for subliminal action)… Jeannie.
    Hey… she can also be a real genie. I’ll even use the deserted island, guys in the military, and the song.

    So, if you are going to rip off something… might as well rip-it-off it completely   :-)

  15. I was just watching this old movie on tv…
    Operation Bikini (1963)
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057387/
    About military guys on a sub going to the isolated Bikini island.
    One guy has a picture of his girl friend glued to the torpedo right above where he sleeps.
    He always says he is “dreaming about her in the bikini.”

    That’s all fine but the end of the movie show girls in bikinis on a deserted island and they play a song that sounds just like “I dream of Jeannie.”

    So I guess Sidney Sheldon…
    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0791084/
    …saw that movie? “I Dream of Jeannie” was 2 years after it.

    Here’s the whole thought process…
    Think of a girls name that rhymes with bikini (for subliminal action)… Jeannie.
    Hey… she can also be a real genie. I’ll even use the deserted island, guys in the military, and the song.

    So, if you are going to rip off something… might as well rip-it-off it completely   :-)

  16. Marina Orlova a.k.a. HotForWords…?
    She is way too smart and sexy so I stuck her in the goolag…
    http://www.goolag.com/

  17. hmmm… google + boobs = orlova… you know the rest.
    I made a visual.
    I saw something like it with Salma.
    Salma is also very beautiful but trusty owns that spot :-)
    {subliminal breast fixation}

    • neuroway says:

      Salma is Salma. trusty is trusty. Do not confuse apples with peanuts, G-Boy! I know that everything is strings, but sometimes, only a Salma is a Salma, just like only a peanut can really be a peanut. We both see the : it seems. You may be more aware of your surroundings than I first thought, after all, boy! :-)

  18. I want to grow my hair back! Anybody know how I can make it grow quickly! Rub my fingernails perhaps?

    …this looks correct…
    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_you_make_your_hair_grow_faster_and_longer

  19. neuroway says:

    {This will be the beginning of a very serious discussion with somebody about something} Perhaps with G-Boy. I just don’t know about what for now. Voidness and emptiness perhaps. Perhaps about balls and strings, and their respective flavours and frequencies. I will find out as soon as someone replies to this comment.

  20. Nothing is Solid…

    Contrary to popular belief… nothing is even remotely solid. At the sub atomic level it is well known the nucleus radius to electron orbital ratio is one hundred thousandth.
    That makes the volumetric or spatial difference…

    one quadrillionth = 10^-15 = ( .000 000 000 000 001 ) .

    This ratio is approximately the same size as a spherical dot (tittle) above the letter ” i ” (the proton) on the fifty – yard line in a football stadium (the orbital) everything else is empty space. That’s 99.9999999999999 % empty space.

  21. Somebody asked for brand new interesting formulae…?

    Here they are…

    Tension of Space: T = mc^2/L

    Everything is made from strings. The basic particle is 10 strings joined at their centers (or 20 radii). When they are balled up they are a proton or neutron. The individual radii (1 of 20 strings) are the connectors used to connect neutron to protons (balled up) and proton to electrons (full length but twisted together).

    An electron is shaped like the metal spines of an umbrella (without the hinges or fabric of course). One string extents from were your hand would hold it up to the center of axis. There, eighteen strings (or radii) extent out in the same type shape as the umbrella. The last string goes straight up (the same length as all the rest) and connects with the field in space (space is made of the same stuff by the way. This same basic particle (with nothing balled up or twisted) is also the strings used in free space for conveyance of light and gravity).

    (N)-(P)————————————-E———————————

    The mass of a proton is 1 amu.
    The length of 2 radii (or the diameter of an atom) is one angstrom.
    That is the equivalent of one string connection in any given direction.
    The mass of the 2 radii is 2/20 amu (or 1/10 of the proton).
    The speed of light is well known.

    Formula for Tension = velocity squared * mass / length.

    The really cool thing is you can google this…

    (speed of light ^ 2 * .1 amu) / 1 angstrom

    and the google calculator pops up with the correct answer for the tension of space…
    ((the speed of light^2) * .1 amu) / (1 angstrom) = 0.14924179 newtons

    Can this be theoretically correct?

    I thought about this some more…

    If you have 2 weights pulling tension on a string.
    There would be no way to know the density of the string between them (even if the weights are made of the same type string material).
    If the string was thick or thin the tension would remain the same.

    This is what troubled me about just dividing the proton into 20 pieces and using that number as the mass. Although the proton is made from the same string material… the string (mass) itself is not dependant on that.
    Whatever the string is made from can’t actually be equated directly with mass. It is the smallest scale universal substance.

    But then I thought of another possible solution… the difference in the neutron and proton mass. That might actually be the closest mass number available for a string. If the neutron – proton difference is one string radius then 2 of them will equal the atomic diameter.

    So I used that in the equation… T = mc^2/L
    Tension = c^2 * (2 (neutron mass – proton mass)) divided by angstrom length

    google (speed of light ^ 2 * (2 * (1.67490 * 10^-27 kg – 1.67260 * 10^-27 kg)) / 1 angstrom

    All of the neutron strings are balled up. The proton has one string attaching to the electron. That is why it is slightly less mass.
    It is not 1/ 20th because the individual string mass is the “universal substance” not the same as what is called proton mass.

    Here is the google result by the way…
    google ((the speed of light^2) * (2 * ((1.67490 * ((10^(-27)) kg)) – (1.67260 * ((10^(-27)) kg))))) / (1 angstrom) = 0.00413427382 newtons

    The only other alternative available at the moment is electron mass, But that has charge on it and it is also attached to the proton. I think the neutron minus proton is the one to go with.

    Mass
    Mass… for instance something that has a proton, is a particle with strings balled up.
    It doesn’t actually convert into energy… it releases what can be considered its energy by un-balling.
    The particle is still there but now its shape has changed into the regular particle (un-balled) 10 strings with common center (or 20 radii).

    The energy contained in the nucleus of an atom is actually only potential energy.

    It is the same as a balled of group of proton strings with other field strings pulling tension on them from multiple directions. When something like a reaction happens and the balled up proton strings can unwind… the field strings will pull (actually snap) all of the proton strings to their full length (that’s the same length as the field strings) going from the size of a proton to commandeering the volumetric size an atom takes up in space. This instantly creates the massive disruption (instant extra field particle strings) in the particle field in one spot and the electro-magnetic pulse.

    Note: this is not the same as accelerating protons in the LHC. There, the protons actually do have energy because they are moving and smashing together.

    Dark Energy — Everything is pulled on equally from all directions by the field.
    Gravity — When 2 masses are introduced into the field thwy form endpoints and pull together.
    Dark Matter — Tha’s the field itself… it is made from the same particles as everything else, it has mass but can’t be seen (it is what is used to convey light and pull objects together).

    All of this is actually easily explained with that new formula I came up with… T = mc^2/L
    And if we multiply both side by Length…

    TL = mc^2
    Tension * Length = mass * speed of light squared

    That means the Tension of the strings in space times their length is equal to their energy.

    “speed of light ^ 2 * .1 amu” …notice it’s the same as mc^2

    speed of light^2 * .1 atomic mass units = 1.4924179 × 10^-11 joules

    I guess this is why the speed of light is involved in Einsteins mass energy equivalence equation… E=mc^2
    I always wondered why… now I know

    for anyone that didn’t notice the point, both sides of the new equatin TL = mc^2 are equal to Energy…

    E = TL = mc^2
    Energy = Tension * Length = Mass * Velocity squared

    p.s.
    The speed of light “c” is how fast the vibration travels
    The frequency is the number of vibrations (like cycles per second)

    TL = mc^2
    mc^2 = TL
    c^2 = TL / m

    c = square root (TL / m)

    The speed of light equals the square root of the quantity… tension of space times the length of string divided by the mass of space.

    Note: The Universe must be made of something. This theory assumes the basic unit of Universal Substance is a one-dimensional string.

    The strings in question must be capable of conveying information, for instance electro – magnetic vibrations. And since there are different frequencies and / or strengths of vibrations with multiple simultaneous combinations, a zero-dimensional single point particle would be incapable of achieving this… it can spin or move or remain at rest but there is no chance of Simultaneity or vibrations.

    The next possible alternative is the one dimensional line or string (any intrinsic universal characteristic will always be the simplest and at the same time most efficient option).

    The string seems to be the shape of choice in this case. On a musical instrument, a violin for instance, the string can convey a multitude of vibrations, tones and harmonics.

    This means there can be a lot of simultaneous information transmitted along a one dimensional string.

    There is no need to attempt theoretical construction of a particle made of two dimensional planes (like a pop-tart shape) because… you don’t keep looking for the answer after you have found it.
    And, if we integrate enough of the planes into a stack, we would have a solid.

    Nothing is Solid. Space is not Empty. If you quit HotForWords nothing happens.

    Why woud you want to quit this anyway…?
    http://twitpic.com/1um4mk

    • neuroway says:

      hmm… I don’t think anyone asked for that yoB-G. But feel free to elaborate a bit on it. It is not very clear actually. Why is nothing solid? And why is space not empty? And what does it all relate to Energy and the 7 notes of Gootar?

      Could the 7 notes of Gootar be related to motorcycle exhaust too, by the way of Energy? I wonder, yes, I do wonder about this. I am about to think about formulae to explain this actually.

      You mind if I call you yoB-G? Well, yoB-G, will it strike a nerve inside you if someone calls you “Fuckhead” or say “Go fuck yourself” to you? Or will it just inspire you to reach new heights?

    • neuroway says:

      Do you think electrons are 3D objects yoB-G? Or 2D? Or are they dimentionless? I personally think that electrons are negatively-turbocharged hyperfast balls. Whatcha think?

      • How can a ball (or a point) be capable of different frequencies and vibrations? That is the main reason everything has to be strings.

        From above…
        “And since there are different frequencies and / or strengths of vibrations with multiple simultaneous combinations, a zero-dimensional single point particle would be incapable of achieving this… it can spin or move or remain at rest but there is no chance of Simultaneity or vibrations.”

        • neuroway says:

          No no no! And NO! I am sorry, but I don’t believe you. And I don’t like your comment, so I am not going to “like” it. I believe that electrons are negatively-turbocharged hyperfast balls, and not strings! And I don’t care about their different frequencies and vibrations!

          Let us not get sidetracked here. You must CLEARLY prove to me that balls are incapable of different frequencies and vibrations first, then I’ll “like” your comment. All right?

          First off.. Are balls capable of a single frequency and vibration? Yes? No? And why?

          And is your theory on balls and strings somewhere on the net? Did you write any paper to explain it? Are you a member of the IEEE?

    • Anonymous says:

      Everything is made from strings. The basic particle is 10 strings joined at their centers (or 20 radii).

      How did you calculate that the basic particle is made from 10 strings? Do bosons and fermions differ according to your theory? Are different spin numbers of particles related to different patterns of vibrations of strings?

      • Basic particle… Flux Particle
        That is the shape that makes everything work.
        If any strings join together at their ends and then more strings are attracted to the joint… it will build into the shape in question. When it reaches a point where there are twenty strings sticking into one center, that’s the point where no more strings will fit all the way into the center of the package, it’s the cut off point. The vertices of the dodecahedron or the faces of the icosahedron (platonic solids.)
        Stuff had to form somehow, this is a way it can happen automatically.

      • Notice the way the first three (rare) are vertical in the chart…21 Sc Scandium 39 Y Yttrium 57 La Lanthanum…and have an atomic number with difference of 18 between them. Most of the chart is like that (notice how many columns there are). It’s because 18 is the determinant number in electron shell configuration.Every particle has 20 strings. One is attached to the proton. One connects with space (or an electron in the next outer shell). The other 18 form the electron disc. This also makes “18″ the determinant number in Electron shell arrangements, check the larger noble gases: Argon 18, Krypton 36, Xenon 54, Radon 86, the amount of electrons in outermost shells will always sum to 18, the first three even have atomic numbers that are multiples of eighteen.Three groups of six radii from one electron can form (along with seven other electrons) the corners of a cube or the “Octet Rule” and seal off the package.

  22. neuroway says:

    Tra la la woopa woopa! Here comes another one!

  23. neuroway says:

    Blah blah blah – one more! Like/comment ratio down to 31% now.

    • neuroway says:

      Dude, your comments are breeding like rabbits, damnit! Like/comment ratio down to 30% now! Screw quantity! Think about quality, stoopid! And STOP talking to yourself!

      • leoNard says:

        “Although he graduated at the top of his class, he felt something of an outsider as a poor man surrounded by children of the French elite, and that feeling continued even as he became part of the French intelligentsia. ‘A lot of what I’ve done has been in reaction to the École Normale,’ he said in an interview with The New York Times a year ago. ‘I think if I hadn’t become a sociologist, I would have become very anti-intellectual. I was horrified by that world.’”

        Alan Riding. “Pierre Bourdieu, 71, French Thinker and Globalization Critic,” The New York Times (January 25, 2002).

        MARINA: the practice of “to practice”…how’s your English?… … http://www.hotforwords.com/disqus/#comment-105730128“>proclaimed area to practice “HotForWords” {commenting}(don’t like, butt love!)…… VANITY FARE HITCHIN A RIDE

  24. hmmm… 594 videos divided by 31 Moby Dick’s equals 19 pages of comments?
    Every page approximately 320 comments… times 19 pages that equals 6,080 comments
    Most of the guys listed above wrote a least one of the Moby Dick’s. :impressed:
    A lot of people (like Evan 3263) wrote half a Moby. I wrote 1/10 Moby.

    Trusty wrote, directed and stars in the 30 hour Moby Dick video.
    (or 15 and one half actual Moby Dick Movies )

    http://www.hotforwords.com/2010/11/08/plagiarize/#comment-103462044
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049513/

  25. seesixcm6 says:

    Dear Marina, Happy Birthday and enjoy a wonderful time during your day!
    SeesixCM6

  26. seesixcm6 says:

    Dear Marina, Happy Birthday and enjoy a wonderful time during your day!
    SeesixCM6

  27. seesixcm6 says:

    Dear Marina, Happy Birthday and enjoy a wonderful time during your day!
    SeesixCM6

  28. seesixcm6 says:

    Dear Marina, Happy Birthday and enjoy a wonderful time during your day!
    SeesixCM6

  29. Evan Owen says:

    Turning the comments into a novel…um, I think they’d need some serious editing. :neutral:

  30. Evan Owen says:

    So what’s so hard about “Gravitatsi Malchik”? :???: :razz:

  31. Wow, I had that Van Halen song “Hot For Teacher” running through my head, and that should have given me a clue..

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY you sweet young thing! :-)

  32. mehdi says:

    hallo,i am new here and i wonna ask how do you figure out HOT FOR WORDS, is that because you specialized on itemology?and the same time because you’re hot?
    And also i am asking if is that your real character or just pretend,because your method is very impressive.
    thank you for sharing us your knowledge…

  33. Capman911 says:

    Happy Birth Day Marina. ;-) May this day and the rest of your life be filled with Happiness and fulfillment. ;-)

    Mike

  34. Smokey Lightfoot says:

    Joyeux Anniversaire… Marine

  35. wetsuit5 says:

    What did the Macho Womanizer Gorby get you for your special day?

  36. wetsuit5 says:

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY MARINA!!!!!

    But to tell the truth, I don’t see any aging.
    You must have a secret case of Neuro Backwards Clock.

    ALL THE BEST

  37. Anonymous says:

    Once again: Happy Birthday Marina! No, not only Birthday, may your whole life be happy!

  38. Anonymous says:

    Marina, maybe Gravityboy (гравитации мальчик) should become your new TA (if this institution still exists)?

    He cares about you almost so much as if you were his girlfriend! That’s really nice! And it’s nice you appreciate him! He deserves it!

  39. samuel3d says:

    Hi Marina, I just wanted to wish you a Happy Birthday.

  40. leoNard says:

    happy day for celebrating…………. гравитации мальчик……… I Just Want To Celebrate ………….super…………..happy birthday to the the host too!

  41. Thanks trusty… Happy Birthday, another “foolproof” solution.

    p.s. Wow…. LeoNard, 11,000 (thousand)
    I’ll try to Ketchup or is it Catsup?

These are facebook comments below.

Author:

Not your typical philologist! Putting the LOL in PhiLOLogy :-)