Atlas of “True” Names
fryguy451 sent me this on Twitter, and it’s the Atlas of True Names where German cartographers Stephan Hormes and Silke Preust, inspired by the place names in J.R.R. Tolkien’s “Lord of the Rings” trilogy, decided to go back time and through etymology, find the original, descriptive names of each place in the world. As stated by the authors:
Many geographical names are clearly rooted in Man’s observation of his natural environment;
the physical location of a settlement: “At the Foot of the Mountain” – Piedmont, the character of an important water course: “The Gentle One” – The Seine or even just the local vegetation: “Under the Oaks” – Potsdam.
Unsurprisingly, countries and landscapes often derive their names from the characteristics
of the people who lived there: “Great Land of the Tattooed” – Great Britain,
whilst local mythology and regional rulers also frequently leave their legacy:
“Isle of the Monster’s Eye” – Peleponnese or “Illustrious Emperor” – Zaragoza.
I never thought of the Brits as the Tattooed ones, but I love it! Take a look at the map above and you will see how descriptive these names were.
The only problem with the book is that the authors encountered something that I encounter every day.. and that is false etymologies.
In the authors’ desires to keep the book interesting, rather than throw out the false etymologies, they decided to leave quite a few of them in, for example the word-origin of the Mexican peninsula of Yucatan, which is stated in the Atlas as “I don’t understand you!” — supposedly uttered by the Maya when addressed by the first Spanish conquistadores. You’ll recall a similar folk etymology that I did of the word kangaroo and a supposed miscommunication between aboriginals and British explorers which I did here. Even I had fun with it, as folk etymologies are often more exciting than the true origins.
So, the authors left quite a few of these in the book, agreeing that the book is only about 80% true. The authors claim that they are just trying to get you to look at the world through new eyes, so you will have to take 20% of the names with a grain of salt! The only problem I see, is that, I’m not sure if they point out which etymologies are false and which ones are true, making this book not the most accurate reference book for place names (wikipedia anyone?), but a fun read nonetheless.
What do you think about their approach?
Excerpts from the book can be found here.



My Butterfly

