<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How I make HD videos for YouTube and how to FAKE HD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/</link>
	<description>Marina Orlova - Not your typical philologist. Etymology, philology, word origins, origin of, hot teacher.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Rutherford</title>
		<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/#comment-200341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Rutherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotforwords.com/?p=3118#comment-200341</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Sony Vegas, and I set the output to 16:9 format, 854x480 as my resolution. I use a Canon A590IS for a lot of stuff including the underwater video. Recently I got a Canon 130EX which shoots 720P and works well. I still down-convert to 854x480 so the file sizes are more manageable.  That may not fly for broadcast... I think it does fine for YouTube. 

As for external audio... I purchased a ($90) MP3 recorder and a clip mic. I record the audio from both the camera and the MP3 recorder. Once in the video suite (MAC or PC) you can select which soundtrack you like, or pan between them. I only recently started doing this... so many older videos still have the wind noise, etc.

Thanks for the tips!
Askjerry - http://askjerry.info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Sony Vegas, and I set the output to 16:9 format, 854&#215;480 as my resolution. I use a Canon A590IS for a lot of stuff including the underwater video. Recently I got a Canon 130EX which shoots 720P and works well. I still down-convert to 854&#215;480 so the file sizes are more manageable.  That may not fly for broadcast&#8230; I think it does fine for YouTube. </p>
<p>As for external audio&#8230; I purchased a ($90) MP3 recorder and a clip mic. I record the audio from both the camera and the MP3 recorder. Once in the video suite (MAC or PC) you can select which soundtrack you like, or pan between them. I only recently started doing this&#8230; so many older videos still have the wind noise, etc.</p>
<p>Thanks for the tips!<br />
Askjerry &#8211; <a href="http://askjerry.info" rel="nofollow">http://askjerry.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatianna LovingFit</title>
		<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/#comment-197841</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatianna LovingFit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotforwords.com/?p=3118#comment-197841</guid>
		<description>Privet Marina, Spasibo za post. Â U menya flip camera sony HD, ya vse peregivala chto qualiti plohoe poluchitsya. Â Vopros - esli ya hochu delat tolko simple editing smogu li ya ispolzovat tolko iMovie? Â Tak kak ya ne ispolzuu green screen? BTW - ti super, takaya umnaya i molodes. Â Ya tolko nedavno posluchainosti natknulas na tvoi video na Youtube, ya obojau ih smotret.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Privet Marina, Spasibo za post. Â U menya flip camera sony HD, ya vse peregivala chto qualiti plohoe poluchitsya. Â Vopros &#8211; esli ya hochu delat tolko simple editing smogu li ya ispolzovat tolko iMovie? Â Tak kak ya ne ispolzuu green screen? BTW &#8211; ti super, takaya umnaya i molodes. Â Ya tolko nedavno posluchainosti natknulas na tvoi video na Youtube, ya obojau ih smotret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hs4Mm</title>
		<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/#comment-156230</link>
		<dc:creator>Hs4Mm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotforwords.com/?p=3118#comment-156230</guid>
		<description>By the way, the above is in reply to your question:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
If you guys know of some inexpensive HD camcorders with external mic inputs please let me know below in the comments.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But why are you looking for such a thing?  As a replacement for your iPhone video camera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, the above is in reply to your question:</p>
<blockquote><p>
If you guys know of some inexpensive HD camcorders with external mic inputs please let me know below in the comments.
</p></blockquote>
<p>But why are you looking for such a thing?  As a replacement for your iPhone video camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hs4Mm</title>
		<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/#comment-156193</link>
		<dc:creator>Hs4Mm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 04:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotforwords.com/?p=3118#comment-156193</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never understood what the big deal is about 24 fps as far as viewer experience is concerned ... how about doing one of the lessons that way?  If not a lesson, an experiment on hot4words?  

Till very recently, theaters only showed film running at 24 fps -- and so raw footage is captured at 24 fps.  Pretty soon, theaters will go digital;  if 24 fps does indeed afford a good viewer experience, then these digital theaters would support it;  but I doubt it.  When theaters go digital, they will offer better 3-D because of the better sync between the left and right eyes.  The first digital 3-D, if not  for regular release then at least for experimental release was about a year or so ago -- I got to see parts of it at an event hosted by Intel (we saw it at least 6 months before they were to be released to the public).  We were two movies, both animations;  one involved some kung-foo creature (panda?) and the other was about some president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never understood what the big deal is about 24 fps as far as viewer experience is concerned &#8230; how about doing one of the lessons that way?  If not a lesson, an experiment on hot4words?  </p>
<p>Till very recently, theaters only showed film running at 24 fps &#8212; and so raw footage is captured at 24 fps.  Pretty soon, theaters will go digital;  if 24 fps does indeed afford a good viewer experience, then these digital theaters would support it;  but I doubt it.  When theaters go digital, they will offer better 3-D because of the better sync between the left and right eyes.  The first digital 3-D, if not  for regular release then at least for experimental release was about a year or so ago &#8212; I got to see parts of it at an event hosted by Intel (we saw it at least 6 months before they were to be released to the public).  We were two movies, both animations;  one involved some kung-foo creature (panda?) and the other was about some president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hs4Mm</title>
		<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/#comment-156152</link>
		<dc:creator>Hs4Mm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotforwords.com/?p=3118#comment-156152</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/NixiePixel/status/4953119832&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NixiePixel mentioned&lt;/a&gt; the Kodak Zi8 camcorder -- seems it is 1080p, USB, external mic.  

NixiePixel&#039;s twitter profile picture prompts the following:

Question: What is a phillips screw?

Answer: It&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_F._Phillips&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a screw with a cross&lt;/a&gt;.

Answer continues:  Think about the double meaning in the answer!  NixiePixel&#039;s profile shows the best use for a cross that I know of!

History:  This Q/A was part of the hazing at the college I went to.  I don&#039;t approve of the practice of hazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/NixiePixel/status/4953119832" rel="nofollow">NixiePixel mentioned</a> the Kodak Zi8 camcorder &#8212; seems it is 1080p, USB, external mic.  </p>
<p>NixiePixel&#8217;s twitter profile picture prompts the following:</p>
<p>Question: What is a phillips screw?</p>
<p>Answer: It&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_F._Phillips" rel="nofollow">a screw with a cross</a>.</p>
<p>Answer continues:  Think about the double meaning in the answer!  NixiePixel&#8217;s profile shows the best use for a cross that I know of!</p>
<p>History:  This Q/A was part of the hazing at the college I went to.  I don&#8217;t approve of the practice of hazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hs4Mm</title>
		<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/#comment-156109</link>
		<dc:creator>Hs4Mm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotforwords.com/?p=3118#comment-156109</guid>
		<description>Regarding your question of whether we are interested in knowing how you edit:  The technicalities of using a video editing software suite are not that complex -- not complex to start learning and to develop oneself as an editor.  What is complex is the creative part of taking an OED type entry on the origin of a word and creating a script for a video.  

For my channel, there is only one lesson for which I have a very good script (the script involves a tiger, snake, elephant, and buffalo, with associated sound effects -- and will take me ages to make.  Although the components of the script seem silly, the video won&#039;t be;  and the idea to be communicated is fundamental/abstract, is of wide applicability, is something people can easily understand -- but often attempt to contradict the fact involved!).  I thought if I made a few lesson any-which-way, I would begin to get better script ideas, but that did not happen.  So now I am going to make that one lesson (how ever long it will take) in the hope that the process of making that lesson will give me some insights into communicating my ideas with better scripts.

So I would like to know about how you translate the &quot;text-book&quot; word origins into scripts.

When I watch movies or other visual material, it is just for the story/content/message and not for observing how the content is being communicated.  What do you consider when you watch visual material?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your question of whether we are interested in knowing how you edit:  The technicalities of using a video editing software suite are not that complex &#8212; not complex to start learning and to develop oneself as an editor.  What is complex is the creative part of taking an OED type entry on the origin of a word and creating a script for a video.  </p>
<p>For my channel, there is only one lesson for which I have a very good script (the script involves a tiger, snake, elephant, and buffalo, with associated sound effects &#8212; and will take me ages to make.  Although the components of the script seem silly, the video won&#8217;t be;  and the idea to be communicated is fundamental/abstract, is of wide applicability, is something people can easily understand &#8212; but often attempt to contradict the fact involved!).  I thought if I made a few lesson any-which-way, I would begin to get better script ideas, but that did not happen.  So now I am going to make that one lesson (how ever long it will take) in the hope that the process of making that lesson will give me some insights into communicating my ideas with better scripts.</p>
<p>So I would like to know about how you translate the &#8220;text-book&#8221; word origins into scripts.</p>
<p>When I watch movies or other visual material, it is just for the story/content/message and not for observing how the content is being communicated.  What do you consider when you watch visual material?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hs4Mm</title>
		<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/#comment-156097</link>
		<dc:creator>Hs4Mm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotforwords.com/?p=3118#comment-156097</guid>
		<description>Remembered a few more things:  I looked into cameras around Labor Day.  At that time, Sony cameras at under $1200 were only 1080i (interlaced, not progressive), but the Canon was 1080p.

My criteria were:  

(1) Capture to memory (not tape or drive).  

(2) External mic.  

(3) Manual over-ride of any features such as auto-focus etc.  (Not having this is like not being able to turn of auto-spell-correction!)  

(4) Should be able to capture in low-light conditions.  Cameras have a feature called something like night-light (exact name depends on the manufacturer) -- this is not good because the movie will look like it has been taken by an infra-red camera or will look greenish.   They may also have a feature called something like back-light -- this is good because it somehow results in the effect of the scene being brightly lit from the back!

(5) Hardware support to capture with enhanced contrast (I think that &quot;Michael-amanda&quot; guy uses this feature).

(6) 16 bit audio

(7) Easy means to get captured movie into the computer.

I found out about 1080i vs 1080p while examining cameras at the stores (Frys and Video Only).  

Two other things I found out at the store was the number of sensors in the professional vs in the pro-sumer (and consumer) models;  and that connector at the top of the camera.  I am unclear about that connector at the top.  

My thoughts on Professional vs Pro-sumer:  If I were to buy a camera, I did rather buy the top of the line pro-sumer rather than the bottom-of-the line professional.  I have a similar view for cars too, here&#039;s what I mean:  Car manufacturers have a regular line and a luxury line (Honda-Accura, Toyota-Lexus, Ford-Lincoln, GM has several lines from Chevy to Cadillac);  I would prefer to buy the top of the line mid-size Honda rather than the bottom of the line mid-size Accura.  I believe the same-sized cars in each line are essentially the same, with the luxury line having some tweaks;  so a top-of-the line regular car would be better than the bottom of the line luxury car of the same size;  and the luxury one would cost more because of the brand-name.          

&lt;b&gt;Surprise: &lt;/b&gt;  As of early September 2009, Canon is the only manufacturer who meets both criteria (1 and 2)!  (And Canon&#039;s VIXIA S10 meets the other criteria too!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remembered a few more things:  I looked into cameras around Labor Day.  At that time, Sony cameras at under $1200 were only 1080i (interlaced, not progressive), but the Canon was 1080p.</p>
<p>My criteria were:  </p>
<p>(1) Capture to memory (not tape or drive).  </p>
<p>(2) External mic.  </p>
<p>(3) Manual over-ride of any features such as auto-focus etc.  (Not having this is like not being able to turn of auto-spell-correction!)  </p>
<p>(4) Should be able to capture in low-light conditions.  Cameras have a feature called something like night-light (exact name depends on the manufacturer) &#8212; this is not good because the movie will look like it has been taken by an infra-red camera or will look greenish.   They may also have a feature called something like back-light &#8212; this is good because it somehow results in the effect of the scene being brightly lit from the back!</p>
<p>(5) Hardware support to capture with enhanced contrast (I think that &#8220;Michael-amanda&#8221; guy uses this feature).</p>
<p>(6) 16 bit audio</p>
<p>(7) Easy means to get captured movie into the computer.</p>
<p>I found out about 1080i vs 1080p while examining cameras at the stores (Frys and Video Only).  </p>
<p>Two other things I found out at the store was the number of sensors in the professional vs in the pro-sumer (and consumer) models;  and that connector at the top of the camera.  I am unclear about that connector at the top.  </p>
<p>My thoughts on Professional vs Pro-sumer:  If I were to buy a camera, I did rather buy the top of the line pro-sumer rather than the bottom-of-the line professional.  I have a similar view for cars too, here&#8217;s what I mean:  Car manufacturers have a regular line and a luxury line (Honda-Accura, Toyota-Lexus, Ford-Lincoln, GM has several lines from Chevy to Cadillac);  I would prefer to buy the top of the line mid-size Honda rather than the bottom of the line mid-size Accura.  I believe the same-sized cars in each line are essentially the same, with the luxury line having some tweaks;  so a top-of-the line regular car would be better than the bottom of the line luxury car of the same size;  and the luxury one would cost more because of the brand-name.          </p>
<p><b>Surprise: </b>  As of early September 2009, Canon is the only manufacturer who meets both criteria (1 and 2)!  (And Canon&#8217;s VIXIA S10 meets the other criteria too!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thematrix75</title>
		<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/#comment-156070</link>
		<dc:creator>thematrix75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotforwords.com/?p=3118#comment-156070</guid>
		<description>Hello Marina,good lesson,I would like to hear about how you edit for sure!What&#039;s up with some of these people that typed below have no reply button?Thank you for your time :!:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Marina,good lesson,I would like to hear about how you edit for sure!What&#8217;s up with some of these people that typed below have no reply button?Thank you for your time :!:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greatest Potential</title>
		<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/#comment-156028</link>
		<dc:creator>Greatest Potential</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotforwords.com/?p=3118#comment-156028</guid>
		<description>;-) trained eye knows. nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>;-) trained eye knows. nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wyo550</title>
		<link>http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/#comment-156027</link>
		<dc:creator>wyo550</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotforwords.com/?p=3118#comment-156027</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a side-by-side comparison of image quality:
Part One, Ferraris from Monaco-to Maranello (HQ from AVI upload)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrTVrENF_Fw

Part Two, (Standard quality from WMV upload)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuVhBu0UaUI&amp;feature=related
 (to really see the difference, hit the &quot;HQ&quot; button on Youtube and you&#039;ll see how the in-house Youtube compression turns the WMV into a really blocky compressed image.

To avoid copyright infringement, I broke the song I used in the two videos apart and made them incomplete and I credited both the artist and Sony at the end of each video. Youtube&#039;s system spotted the copyrighted song&#039;s data structure and is selling advertising to the song with my video, which is very cool. I hope the video will sell some albums for Sony and Eros Ramazotti.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a side-by-side comparison of image quality:<br />
Part One, Ferraris from Monaco-to Maranello (HQ from AVI upload)<br />
<span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/LrTVrENF_Fw/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
<p>Part Two, (Standard quality from WMV upload)<br />
<span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://hotforwords.com/2009/10/16/how-i-make-hd-videos-for-youtube-and-how-to-fake-hd/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/UuVhBu0UaUI/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span><br />
 (to really see the difference, hit the &#8220;HQ&#8221; button on Youtube and you&#8217;ll see how the in-house Youtube compression turns the WMV into a really blocky compressed image.</p>
<p>To avoid copyright infringement, I broke the song I used in the two videos apart and made them incomplete and I credited both the artist and Sony at the end of each video. Youtube&#8217;s system spotted the copyrighted song&#8217;s data structure and is selling advertising to the song with my video, which is very cool. I hope the video will sell some albums for Sony and Eros Ramazotti.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

